Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Tacoma, Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2003No. 00-35070PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action, on behalf of itself and as trustee for the Skokomish Indian Tribe (the “Tribe”) and its members, asking for declaratory judgment to invalidate the 1921 condemnation proceedings brought by the City of Tacoma (“Tacoma”) and seeking to void land transfers made by the Tribe long thought by Tacoma to be settled. After cross motions for summary judgment, the District Court granted the United States’ motion, invalidating the condemnation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Corales v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Davis v. Team Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.