Legal Opinion
Flores v. Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided March 8, 2005No. 04-1743PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
The pro se appellant, Rosalia A. Flores, widow of veteran Bruno N. Flores, appeals a June 10, 2004, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) determining that she had forfeited her rights to VA dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) benefits .under 38 U.S.C. § 6103(a). The appellant filed an informal brief and the Secretary filed a brief in this case. The appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a) and 7266(a) to review the Board decision. For the reasons provided herein, the Court will affirm the June 10, 2004, Board…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pauline Prickett v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Flores v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Roberts v. Dept. Of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Pedro P. Del Rosario v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Pauline Prickett v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.