Legal Opinion

Pedro P. Del Rosario v. James B. Peake

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided January 5, 2009No. 06-1596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANCE, Judge:

The appellant, veteran Pedro P. Del Rosario, appeals through counsel a May 15, 2006, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) determining that forfeiture of his benefits pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 6103(a) was proper. Record (R.) at 1-15. For the reasons that follow, the Court will affirm the Board’s May 15, 2006, decision.

I. FACTS

The appellant served in the U.S. Navy from October 1954 to March 1974. R. at 17-20. He was granted service connection for disabilities including coronary artery disease, chronic cystitis and prostatitis, diabetes mellitus, post-concussion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert H. Arneson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  2. Eddie C. Clark v. Peter O'RourkeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018
  3. Robert H. Arneson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API