Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Tullos

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided April 24, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17CV250TSL–RHWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tom S. Lee, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The case is before the court on separate motions by defendants Tracy Tullos and *558Rob Heflin for summary judgment based on qualified immunity pursuant to Rules 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c). Plaintiff Alan Atwood has responded in opposition to the motion. The court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that defendants' motions are well-taken and should be granted.

Alan Atwood (Atwood) has brought the present action…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flynt v. Jasper County, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API