Legal Opinion
Dougherty v. Garrick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1931No. 28,561PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action is one to recover damages for the death of Mary Dougherty, claimed to have been caused by the negligence of defendants.
The action was dismissed on motion of defendants at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. Defendants had not rested or presented any evidence.' A motion for a new trial was made and denied.
Plaintiff presents two questions for review: (1) The general question whether the court erred in dismissing the action; (2) whether the court erred in sustaining defendants’ objections to evidence offered by the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Chadwick v. CornishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keller v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Scott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Engel v. StarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hardy-Burlingham Mining Co. v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Eklund v. EklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.