Legal Opinion
Eklund v. Eklund
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1951No. 35,436PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of district court affirming a final decree of distribution entered by the probate court of St. Louis county.
In affirming the probate court’s final decree of distribution which awarded decedent’s entire estate to her surviving son, Oscar W. Eklund, the district court found that decedent had intentionally, and not hy accident or mistake, made no provision in her will for Roger Eklund, the adopted child of another son, Robert Eklund, who had predeceased her. (See, M. S. A. 525.201.) In 1929, decedent’s two sons, Oscar and Robert, were both living and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pomerenke v. Farmers Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Cocker v. CockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Scott v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Dougherty v. GarrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- In Re Estate of MummSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Winona National & Savings Bank v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- In Re Estate of LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Engel v. StarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Pearson v. BertelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955