Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Auto-Brite Car Wash, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-2106-ZPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZOBEL, District Judge.
This is an action for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and unfair and deceptive trade practices, as well as for breach of the agreements between plaintiff Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) and defendant Auto-Brite Car Wash, Inc. (“AutoBrite”). It is based upon Auto Brite’s actions in selling non-Mobil gasoline allegedly under the Mobil trademark without Mobil's consent. Auto-Brite denies liability and in its counterclaims I and VI alleges that Mobil breached agreements between the parties. Mobil has moved for summary judgment on all the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Electric Company and Carboloy, Inc. v. Robert Speicher and Speicher, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Motor City Bagels, L.L.C. v. American Bagel Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- R.J. Toomey Co. v. ToomeyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Kappa Sigma Fraternity v. Kappa Sigma Gamma FraternityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- Maple Grove Farms of Vermont, Inc. v. Euro-Can Products, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.