Legal Opinion
R.J. Toomey Co. v. Toomey
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 28, 1988No. Civ. A. 84-0111-XXPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff R.J. Toomey Company’s’ (the “Company’s”) motion for partial summary judgment on its claims alleging that the defendant Richard J. Toomey, Jr. (“Too-mey”) falsely designated the origin of his product and competed unfairly in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 93A, §§ 2 and 11.
I.Statement of Facts.
The facts, considered in the light most favorable to Toomey, the non-moving party, are as follows. The defendant’s father, Richard J. Toomey, Sr., founded the Company in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Northern Light Technology, Inc. v. Northern Lights ClubDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Castricone v. MicalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Donoghue v. IBC/USA (PUBLICATIONS), INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Shell Co., Ltd. v. LOS FRAILES SERVICE STATIONDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- DB Riley, Inc. v. AB Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.