Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cordova Recreation & Park District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1972No. Civ. 12636PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, P. J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant Cordova Recreation and Park District for damages following the death of their 4-year-old son, Larry E. Davis, Jr. Defendant’s answer did not allege the design immunity defense. After denial by the trial court of motions for nonsuit and during the defense presentation, the court announced that it found the defense of design immunity established. It then directed judgment for defendant, excused the jury and, over objection, permitted the amendment of defendant’s answer to include the defense of design immunity to conform with proof. The court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Akins v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Pierce v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Powell v. Standard Brands Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API