Legal Opinion

Bersch v. Holton Street State Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The general rule is stated in Schroeder v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1936) 220 Wis. 642, 648, 265 N. W. 559, that one who keeps a store or shop “is bound to exercise reasonable care to keep it in a safe condition for his customers and others whom he invites, expressly or impliedly, to enter on business with him.”

In this case, there is testimony to indicate that the bank had notice that the floor was slippery. In time of storm the likelihood of a slippery walk or floor necessarily comes into existence so that even with knowledge that individuals with wet shoes are using the floor,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schroeder v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walker v. Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  2. Crawford v. SoennichsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Wallace v. JC Penny Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dudley v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ling v. Hosts IncorporatedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API