Legal Opinion
Capital One Bank, N.A. v. Parsons
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 2009No. Case Number: 106034PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAY MITCHELL, Chief Judge.
{1 William Todd Parsons ("Parsons") appeals an order denying his motion for prevailing party attorney fees. We find attorney fees are recoverable here and reverse the decision of the trial court.
T2 On December 27, 2005, Capital One Bank (Capital) filed a lawsuit on an open account alleging a credit card debt owed to it by William T. Parsons, III. According to the proof of service filed in the case, a copy of process was delivered to "Williams T. Parson IIL" No answer was filed, and Capital obtained a default judgment. Four weeks after the default judgment was filed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Professional Credit Collections, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. North American Van LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Genoff Farms, Inc. v. Seven Oaks South, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020