Legal Opinion

Anna L. Tarr, Administratrix of the Estate of James Tarr v. Manchester Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 2, 1976No. 76-1328PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Taking appellant’s claim on its strongest basis, the New Hampshire Supreme Court, on certification to it by the United States District Court of two questions involving the New Hampshire Workmen’s Compensation statute, also answered a third question, which answer, if it stands, is largely dispositive of the present action, against appellant. Tarr, Administratrix v. Republic Corp. (1976), N.H., 352 A.2d 708. Appellant’s counsel discovered this circumstance after the expiration of the ten day period allowed for filing a petition for rehearing in the state court. Instead of moving the New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Tarr v. Republic Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. John T. Demars v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx Corporation, Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Diane Cantwell v. University of Massachusetts and Michael KasavanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API