Legal Opinion

Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1937No. 26416. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In August, 1933, in the case of Matela v. Department of Labor & Industries, 174 Wash. 144, 24 P. (2d) 429, this court affirmed an order of the superior court of Lewis county, directing the department, which had closed Matela’s claim in January, 1932, to reopen the matter, allow further time loss, furnish medical- attention, and otherwise deal with it as the facts and the law applicable thereto might require.

Thereafter, in April, 1934, the department again closed the claim with a permanent partial disability rating of five degrees, and Matela applied for a rehearing before the joint board,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Asplund Construction Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Livingston Oil Corp. v. HensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Matela v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Manahan Drilling Co. v. BazzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prince v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Crabb v. OlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. LeBire v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Mud Bay Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API