Legal Opinion
United Sales Company v. Curtis Peanut Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 22, 1957No. 15226PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
Appellant’s action as plaintiff in trial court against Curtis Peanut Company, Inc., sought recovery for shortages in two shipments of peanuts made by it to plaintiff, amounting to $2,705.13, which shipments the latter had paid for prior to delivery, and for its lost profits of $22,977.75 on the remaining portion of peanuts not delivered by defendant pursuant to its contract to deliver thirteen carloads. An appeal relating to venue of the cause is reported in 283 S.W.2d 113, and in the interest of brevity reference thereto is made for a detail of material facts. Defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dallas Waste Mills v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Magnolia Provision Co. v. ColemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Security Banking & Investment Co. v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Security Banking & Investment Co. v. FlanaganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Planters' Oil Co. v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Janak v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- In Re Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. and Tractebel Power, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003