Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.
Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. (“TEMI”) and Tractebel Power, Inc. (“Tpi”) appeai from an adverse judgment in their breach of contract action against E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company. A jury found DuPont breached the contract and caused TPI damages of $1.2 million, but excused the breach due to commercial impracticability. However, the definition of impracticability given to the jury excluded two critical elements, neither of which was supported by any evidence at trial. Finding no evidence to support the only issue found in DuPont’s favor, we reverse…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. v. Kingwood Crossroads, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Amigo Broadcasting, LP v. Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Chisos Joint Venture I, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Waddy v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
- BP Chemicals, Inc. v. AEP Texas Central Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.