Legal Opinion
Ally & Gargano, Inc. v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1985No. 84 Civ. 7928 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
This action arises out of the alleged breach of a written agreement between plaintiff Ally & Gargano, Inc. (“Ally”) and defendant Comprehensive Accounting Corp. (“Comprehensive”). Comprehensive now moves to dismiss this action on the ground that it is not subject to the in personam jurisdiction of this court. The motion is denied.
Facts
Comprehensive is a Delaware corporation with its principal corporate office in Aurora, Illinois. Comprehensive is not qualified to do business in the State of New York; it does not maintain an office in New York; it has no employees…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Delagi v. Volkswagenwerk AG of WolfsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Miller v. Surf Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Haar v. Armendaris Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- H. Heller & Co., Inc. v. Novacor Chemicals Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Klinghoffer v. S.N.C. Achille Lauro Ed Altrigestione Motonave Achille Lauro in Amministrazione StraordinariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Artemide SpA v. Grandlite Design & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987