Legal Opinion
Artemide SpA v. Grandlite Design & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1987No. 87 Civ. 3178 (JMC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is granted in part and denied in part. Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a). Grandrich’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Its motion to dismiss for improper venue is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3).
BACKGROUND
This is an action for trade dress infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiffs Artemide SpA and Artemide Inc. are the manufacturer and exclusive United States distributor respectively of the “Tizio” lamp. Defendant Grandlite Design and Mfg. Co. [“Grandlite”]…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Stern's Miracle-Gro Products, Inc. v. Shark Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Riviera Trading Corp. v. Oakley, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- PaF Srl v. Lisa Lighting Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.