Legal Opinion

Shelby Mutual Plate Glass & Casualty Co. v. Lynch

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

Upon the issue whether the Shelby policy furnished limited insurance for liability of the named insured for injuries to his employees incurred in the operation of his motor vehicles, argument is advanced for Travelers that the policy contains no effective provision for such limitation. It is asserted that the exclusionary clause is nullified by the effect of the endorsement setting forth the statutory terms of a standard motor vehicle policy. One of the terms is that the insurance shall be available for any injured person except employees of the named insured entitled to workman’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  2. McConnell v. LamontagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Stevens v. Mutual Protection Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  4. Smart v. HuckinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. BuxtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Michael Newell v. Markel Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  2. Standard Accident Insurance v. SwiftSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  3. American Employers Insurance v. WordenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  4. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. ManzerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SniersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API