Legal Opinion

Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. Manzer

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1943No. 3426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.

In addition to the foregoing facts, it might be stated that Mrs. Howland after working for Mrs. Manzer in 1940, went south with Mrs. Manzer, in the latter’s automobile, to spend the winter with Mrs. Manzer where the latter had a winter home. Mrs. Howland paid a small portion of the expenses both on the trip south and at the home during the winter. There was no arrangement as to the defrayal of expense on the way back. Mrs. Manzer was taking Mrs. Howland back with her with the understanding on the part of both that Mrs. Howland would work for Mrs. Manzer during the season of 1941, which was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  2. Shelby Mutual Plate Glass & Casualty Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. SwiftSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DrinkardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. PinkardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API