Legal Opinion
Dravo Corp. v. Zuber
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 9, 1992No. 8:CV 91-00499PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants Zuber and Burlington Northern Railroad Company’s motions for summary judgment (filings 90 and 97). Although confronted with a small mountain of paper, I conclude that the defendants’ motions should be granted. The straightforward legal issue, uncomplicated by disputed material facts, is whether the so-called “de minimis” settlement agreement — entered into by and between defendants and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)— precludes plaintiff from maintaining this suit. Finding that sections 113(f)(2),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Dravo Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1995
- Dravo Corporation v. Morton Zuber, Zuber Company, and Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Ekotek Site PRP Committee v. SelfDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.