Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Nance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1986No. 84-2495PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiffs, Chester Lee Brooks and Larry Joe Brooks,1 are Delaware Indians who sell cigarettes and tobacco products in their smoke shop in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Their business premises are leased from two Creek Indians whose power of alienation over the land is restricted.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City Vending of Muskogee, Inc. v. The Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Oyler v. FinneyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- State v. ZamanArizona Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.