Legal Opinion

Stivers v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 25, 2003No. CR 02-1140PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Harold Stivers appeals his conviction for fading to stop after an accident, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 27-53-101 (Supp. 2001). On appeal, Stivers argues that the trial court erred in refusing to give the jury his proffered instruction, and that the court improperly commented on his right not to testify. Stivers’s first point has no merit, and his second point is not preserved for our review; accordingly, we affirm.

On August 21, 2001, Stivers was involved in an automobile accident in which he ran his pickup truck into the back of Jessica Price’s car on Cantrell Road in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Ramaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Richie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Woolbright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API