Wheeler v. County of Plumas
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Campbell, Metson & Campbell, and Cheney, Massey & Smith, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered against plaintiffs after they had declined to amend upon demurrer sustained to their first amended complaint, and the only question presented is as to the validity of the order sustaining such demurrer.
The facts as gathered from the amended complaint are as follows: The board of supervisors of Plumas County on the 9th of January, 1900, enacted an ordinance entitled “An ordinance levying a license tax on persons, firms, copartnerships and corporations carrying on the business of raising, grazing, herding, or pasturing sheep or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Napa State Hospital v. FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Moss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Vitale v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. MinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- In Re GrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.