Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1925No. 19397. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The respondent, Hart, was informed against in the superior court of Pierce county for the crime of ashing a bribe. A demurrer was interposed to the information on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court, whereupon the prosecuting attorney elected to stand thereon and refused to plead further. A judgment of dismissal was thereupon entered, from which judgment the appeal before us is prosecuted. The ultimate question therefore is, do the facts stated in the information constitute a crime.

The information, omitting…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. WhetstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API