State v. Hart
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— The respondent, Hart, was informed against in the superior court of Pierce county for the crime of ashing a bribe. A demurrer was interposed to the information on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court, whereupon the prosecuting attorney elected to stand thereon and refused to plead further. A judgment of dismissal was thereupon entered, from which judgment the appeal before us is prosecuted. The ultimate question therefore is, do the facts stated in the information constitute a crime.
The information, omitting…
2Cited by19 opinions
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. EiltsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. WhetstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.