Legal Opinion

Hardy v. City of Nome

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided November 10, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00001Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA CLARICE LEOTA HARDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF NOME, et al., ) ) No. 2:20-cv-0001-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint Defendant John Papasodora moves for leave to file a third-party complaint.1 This motion is opposed by plaintiff Clarice Leota Hardy.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background Plaintiff alleges that she “was employed by the City of Nome, NPD, [Nome Police Department] from 2015 to 2018.”3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Stewart v. American International Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Irwin v. MascottDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  5. Ennen v. Integon Indemnity Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API