Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Tyrone Anderson (90-5313) and Michael Wayne McNeil (90-5507)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1991No. 90-5313, 90-5507PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Anthony Anderson and Michael McNeil appeal from their convictions for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Both defendants appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress the firearms they possessed. Anderson also appeals from his enhanced sentence under the armed career criminal provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). That section provides that a person convicted of violating § 922(g) who has previously been convicted of three violent felonies, a term defined in § 924(e)(2)(B), shall receive a minimum…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Katherine Gardenhire and Walter Gardenhire v. Donald Schubert, in His Individual and Official Capacity as Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Stemler v. City of FlorenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.