Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 29, 1965No. 5317PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Arthur Swenson was on July 1, 1959, when the policy in question was issued, an authorized and trained agent of Metropolitan dealing only in policies issued by it. Prior to that date he had visited the plaintiff Taylor to collect premiums on existing policies and discuss the prospects for additional coverage. On July 1, 1959, he called on Taylor and his wife and discussed with them the issuance of the present policy. Pursuant to the training given to him by Metropolitan, Swenson read to Taylor each and every question in the application consisting of two pages, entitled “Part A” and “Part B,”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Bronson v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Marshall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Whitmore v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  5. Malloy v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Union Bankers Insurance Co. v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Velez-Gomez v. SMA Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Estate of Doe v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Johnson v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. COMPANYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API