Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Washington National Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1965No. Gen. 64-130PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

At issue in this case is the meaning and effect of the incontestibility clause of defendant’s disability insurance policy, which provides:

“Time Limit on Certain Defenses: (a) After two years from the policy date no misstatements made by the Insured in the copy of the application for this policy shall be used to void the policy or deny a claim for loss incurred or disability (as defined in this policy) commencing after the expiration of such two-year period.”

Section 357a(1)(b) of the Insurance Code (Ill Rev Stats 1963, c 73, par 969a(1)(b)), upon which said clause is predicated, provides in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Moscov v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lentin v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People Ex Rel. Bell v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Caster v. Motors Ins. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Velez-Gomez v. SMA Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. People ex rel. Department of Professional Regulation v. ManosIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hines v. Department of Public AidIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Brunton v. KrugerIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lauer v. American Family Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API