Legal Opinion

Lippman v. Ostrum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The infant plaintiffs seek redress for personal injuries suffered August 17, 1953, allegedly in consequence of the negligent operation by the defendant Ostrum of his own automobile in the service of his codefendant, Kittatinny Lodge, Inc., by whom he was employed as a counsellor at the Lodge’s summer camp in Sussex County, New Jersey. The parents sue per quod for medical expenses incurred in the treatment of the infants’ injuries and for the loss of their services.

The infant plaintiffs were also camp counsellors in the employ of the Lodge.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Munson v. RupkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Kitchens v. DuffieldOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Delany v. BadameIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tisko v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Mistretta v. AlessiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Nesta v. MeyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Araujo v. NJ Natural Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API