Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients & Families Compensation Fund

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 5, 2017No. 2014AP2812PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.

¶ 1. This is an appeal stemming from a circuit court decision finding the $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages in medical practice actions, as articulated in Wis. Stat. § 893.55 (2015-16),1 unconstitutional as it applied to Ascaris and Antonio Mayo. This is also a cross-appeal of the circuit court's finding that the statutory cap is not unconstitutional on its face. We conclude that the statutory cap on noneco-nomic damages is unconstitutional on its face because it violates the same principles our supreme court articulated in Ferdon ex rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2005 WI…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Smith, Ed H. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Thorp v. Town of LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ascaris Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  3. Ascaris Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Ascaris Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Ascaris Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API