Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ascaris Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2018No. 2014AP002812Published

1Dissent

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).

¶98 After a harrowing and unimaginable ordeal that resulted in the amputation of all four of Ascaris Mayo's extremities, the majority denies Ascaris and Antonio Mayo 95 percent of the recovery to which a jury determined they are entitled. The majority restricts the Mayos' recovery based on Wisconsin's statutory cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases, which it now declares to be constitutional. See Wis. Stat. § 893.55.

¶99 This is not the first time this court has addressed the constitutionality of a cap on noneconomic damages in medical…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. City of Madison v. GeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. WantaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API