Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Juliano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1985No. 02234PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for possession of a counterfeit controlled substance and conspiracy. 1 Appellant contends, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to establish his possession of the contraband. 2 We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

In determining whether the evidence is sufficient in law to prove that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime or crimes charged, we must, after a verdict of guilty, accept as true all of the evidence, direct or circumstantial, and all reasonable inferences arising from the evidence, upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. StampsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParrishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. HeidlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API