Commonwealth v. Juliano
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for possession of a counterfeit controlled substance and conspiracy. 1 Appellant contends, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to establish his possession of the contraband. 2 We agree and, accordingly, reverse.
In determining whether the evidence is sufficient in law to prove that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime or crimes charged, we must, after a verdict of guilty, accept as true all of the evidence, direct or circumstantial, and all reasonable inferences arising from the evidence, upon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. StampsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParrishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. HeidlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.