Legal Opinion

Hancock v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 2011No. CA CR 10-670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG MARTIN, Judge.

| lAppellant Charles Hancock was convicted of possession of ephedrine, pseu-doephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine and sentenced to six years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, Hancock raises two arguments for reversal, contending that '1) the circuit court erred in allowing the statement of a witness, Joseph James, to be read into evidence, and 2) the court erred by interjecting, on its own initiative, evidence that had not been introduced at trial.

On May 12, 2009, agent Jason Akers of the Tenth Judicial District…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Jordan v. GuinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samuel Golden v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API