Legal Opinion

Harris v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 29, 1992No. 3:91-0863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above styled action is the movant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The movant, Carl Robert Harris, pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Harris now argues that his prior felony conviction in state court, which formed the basis for this federal conviction, did not divest him of his right to bear arms and therefore his possession of the firearm was not in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Calvin CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Gaskin v. CollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. United States v. LandawDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. James DeWayne NixCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API