Legal Opinion

DEGENS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00971Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY ANGELO DEGENES, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-971 ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, ) and DAVID M. HARDY, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction In the complaint (ECF No. 1), pro se plaintiff Anthony Angelo DeGenes (“DeGenes”)1 contends that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and David M. Hardy (“Hardy”), an FBI agent and section chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section (“RIDS”) (collectively, “defendants”), committed misconduct. Specifically, DeGenes…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API