Legal Opinion
Gifford-Hill Cement Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 31, 1985No. 83-12-01737PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiffs, an ad hoc group of portland hydraulic cement producers located in California and Nevada and the labor union representing that area’s production workers, challenge a final determination of the United States International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission). In its determination, made pursuant to § 735(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1673d(b)(l) (1982), the Commission concluded that an industry in the United States was not materially injured or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of portland hydraulic cement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Leonard P. Matlovich v. Secretary of the Air Force and Colonel Alton J. ThogersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States Steel Group—A Unit of USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.