Legal Opinion

Douglas & Co. v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Railroads. Negligence. Nonsuit. Before R. T. Eouché, judge pro hac vice. City court of Eloyd county. June term, 1891.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed.

Dean & Smith, for plaintiffs. Dorsey, Brewster & Howell, Wright & Harris and McCutchen & Shumate, for defendant.

Action for damages, the declaration alleging that while the plaintiffs’ horse (a gentle horse, not afraid of trains) was being driven along a road and at a public crossing of the railroad, the driver came in contact with the defendant’s train; and that the employees of defendant failed to blow the whistle or check the train as the statute required at public crossings, and thereby caused a collision between the horse and buggy and the train. To the grant of a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Coleman v. Wrightsville & Tennille RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API