Legal Opinion

Clark v. Interstate Independent Telephone Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1904No. 13,680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

Plaintiff as a taxpayer in the city of South Omaha brought this action for the purpose of having a franchise ordinance granted to the defendant by the mayor and council of the city of South Omaha declared void, and to have defendant restrained from proceeding under its franchise and occupying the public streets and thoroughfares of the city in the construction and installation of its telephone system. The petition is carefully drawn and quite lengthy, setting up numerous alleged defects in the proceedings of the mayor and council, both in the passage of the ordinance, and in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linden Land Co. v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stedman v. City of BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Omaha Bridge CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bard v. Cox Cable of Omaha, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Chizek v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gulledge v. Augusta Coach Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Schumacher v. KlitzingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API