Kilian v. Stackpole Sons, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, of Michigan, sued defendant, a Pennsylvania publisher, for libel. The verdict of the jury was in favor of defendant. Plaintiff seeks a new trial. 1 As required, we view all facts and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom most favorable to the defendant. Rice v. Bauer, 359 Pa. 544 at page 547, 59 A.2d 885; Van Sant v. American Express Co., 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 355, 365.
Since we have only diversity jurisdiction, Pennsylvania law, including its Conflicts of Law rule, determines the substantive rights of the parties. Hartmann v. Time, Inc., 3 Cir., 166 F.2d 127,…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Galib Frangie v. Vocero de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
- Scottie Pippen v. NBCUniversal Media LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- DOMINIAK v. National EnquirerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Allison v. Mennonite Publications BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.