Legal Opinion

Flores v. De Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1921No. Civ. No. 3756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff brought this action in equity, asserting that he was the owner of a one-half interest, which he held in common with the defendant, who owned thé remaining interest, in certain real property which was described in his complaint. He further alleged that income in the way of rentals had been collected by the defendant, who had failed to make accounting to him for any part thereof. His prayer was for partition of the property according to the interests of the parties, and for a share of the rentals and profits as the same might appear to be due him. The allegations of the complaint were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pettigrew v. DobbelaarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. McCullough v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Norwegian Lutheran Church of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dunn v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API