Pettigrew v. Dobbelaar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the head note and opinion of the court.
1Per curiam
Appeal by defendant from a judgment for the recovery of certain lands.
Appellant claims the deed from Harvey to Lacey is void, because it contains no description of the lands sought to be conveyed.
The deed purports to remise, release, and forever quit claim .... those certain pieces and parcels of land in the county *397of San Francisco, State of California, bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit: “Gift Map No. 2, lots No. 308 to 405 inclusive. Gift Map No. 2, lots No. 406, 407; together with all tenements, hereditaments thereto belonging, and also all the estate, right, title, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lick v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- Penry v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Holley's v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- G. R. Holcomb Estate Co. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.