Jonathan Edward Boyer v. Louisiana
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered .
2ConcurrenceJustice Alito, joined by Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas
*238 We granted certiorari in this case to decide "[w]hether a state's failure to fund counsel for an indigent defendant for five years, particularly where failure was the direct result of the prosecution's choice to seek the death penalty, should be weighed against the state for speedy trial purposes." Pet. for Cert. i. The premise of that question is that a breakdown in Louisiana's system for paying the attorneys representing petitioner, an indigent defendant who was charged with a capital offense, caused most of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. MuhtorovCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Jonathan Boyer v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- Jason Christopher Durkee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. NoelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.