Legal Opinion

Interstate Engineering Corp. v. City of Fitchburg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1975PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

The plaintiff appeals from a final decree which declared valid a subbid for certain mechanical work, which had been filed with the defendant city of Fitchburg by the defendant Limbach Company (Limbach).

The judge made findings of fact, which are not challenged. In the early part of 1973, the city invited general bids and subbids for the construction of a waste-water treatment facility. As authorized by G. L. c. 149, § 44C (as amended through St. 1970, c. 497), the city established interior piping work as a separate category of work for the receipt of subbids.2 Although certain ex*753terior piping…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Grande & Son, Inc. v. School Housing Committee of North ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. East Side Construction Co. v. Town of AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. New England Insulation Co. v. General Dynamics Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Computer Shoppe, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. James J. Welch & Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of Capital Planning & OperationsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API