Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. National Bank of Commerce v. Stacy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1939No. 27433. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action involves the order or priority of payment between the holders of refunding bonds of commercial waterway district No. 1, in Kang county. Bonds were issued December 1, 1923, in the amount of $720,000. The proceeds of the sale of these bonds were to be used to retire bonds previously issued. As security for the refunding bonds, the waterway district levied an assessment on property within the district of 53.83 per cent of the total maximum benefits. 49.17 per cent of the total maximum benefits had been levied upon the issuance of the original bonds. It thus appears that the entire…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Haverty v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rhode Island Mortgage & Trust Co. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lucas v. First Nat. Bank of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michelson Bros. v. BadermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API