Legal Opinion
Bevin Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Starr Bros. Bell Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Decided February 22, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 33,142, granted to Frederick A..Scranton August 28, 1900, for a design for a bell. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
At final hearing on bill and answer, defendants deny the validity and their infringement of complainant’s patent, No. 33,142, granted to Frederick A. Scranton August 28, 1900, for a design for a bell. The specification says:
“As shown in the drawings, the leading or material feature of my design consists of a body part, a, in the form of an oblate spheroid, and having at one end a circular base, b, joined with the body portion, a, by a smaller neck portion, c, which flares out from the point of union with the body part to its point of connection with the base, b. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Western Electric Manuf'g Co. v. OdellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1883
- Dukes v. BauerleU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1890
- The G. L. GarlicDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1891
- Wooster v. CraneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1865
3Cited by10 opinions
- Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- International Seaway Trading Corp. v. Walgreens Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rowley v. TresenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Bradley v. EcclesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.