Legal Opinion
Rowley v. Tresenberg
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 17, 1941No. 1015PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff for injunction, damages and costs against the defendants for the alleged infringement of design patent 109,647 issued to Charles A. Rowley for design for an egg beater or similar article granted May 10th, 1938, on application filed December 13th, 1937.
The plaintiff is the owner of the patent in suit.
This suit was brought originally against Paul Tresenberg and Alexander Sitkoff doing business under the trade name and style of Aurora Electric Company.
In April, 1940, the present suit was commenced against the individual defendants,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Forestek Plating & Mfg. Co. v. Knapp-Monarch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Rowe v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ames Shower Curtain Co. v. Heinz Nathanson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Ramon Reachi and Cafe Candle Lite Mfg., Inc., a Corporation v. Jerome Edmond, Individually and Doing Business as General Wax and Candle CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Patriarca Mfg., Inc. v. SosnickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Tappan Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965