Legal Opinion

Stearns v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1969No. Civ. 33050PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

The case is here on an agreed statement of facts, reading as follows:

“I
“Nature of the Controversy
“A complaint for damages was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, on March 3,1967, against the County of Los Angeles, Harold Kade and several fictitious defendants after compliance hy plaintiff with California Code Section 910 et seq. The first cause of action alleged that Dr. Harold Kade a Deputy County Coroner for the County of Los Angeles, performed an autopsy upon plaintiff’s wife and that said autopsy was performed with negligence, and that as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Connelly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Watson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Putthoff v. AncrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Bradford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Kayfetz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Johnson v. City of PacificaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Herndon v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API