Legal Opinion

Putthoff v. Ancrum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1996No. 2-96-056-CVPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a suit by the parents of Corliss Diane Ancrum against appellants Tarrant County, Nizam Peerwani, M.D., P.A. and Dr. Stephen L. Putthoff (sometimes collectively referred to as “appellants”) for damages caused by an alleged negligently performed autopsy. Dr. Peer-wani, P.A. is the Chief Medical Examiner for Tarrant County. Dr. Putthoff was appointed by Dr. Peerwani, P.A. as a Deputy Medical Examiner under Tex.Code Crim.PROC.Ann. art. 49.25, § 3 (Vernon 1979). 1 In their answers to the Ancrums’ lawsuit, appellants alleged the defenses of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Knowles v. City of GranburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Bates v. Texas State Technical College, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. Guerrero v. Tarrant County Mortician Services Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. City of Cockrell Hill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. National Sports & Spirit, Inc. v. University of North TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API