Legal Opinion
Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 326PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
This case appeared on the March 1956 argument list at Erie. Three motions were heard: (1) defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A.; (2) defendant’s motion under Rule 12 to strike plaintiff’s “Reply and Counterclaim”; and (3) defendant’s objections to certain interrogatories propounded by plaintiff. As defendant’s first motion will be granted it is unnecessary to comment on motions (2) and (3).
In this court plaintiff sued defendant for patent infringement. The complaint was filed August 27, 1954. The jurisdiction is founded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Sbicca-Del Mac, Inc. v. Milius Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- General Motors Corporation v. Rubsam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Philadelphia AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jewell W. Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981