Legal Opinion

Blinder v. United States Fire Insurance of New York

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 17, 1952No. 51 C 195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $4,500, the alleged value of a mink coat. The complaint alleges liability against the defendant, United States Fire Insurance Company, under a policy of insurance issued to plaintiff by the company; and against the defendant, Irm-asam Furs, on the theory of a bailment. At a pre-trial conference of the cause, the Court’s attention was directed to the defense set forth in the answer of Irmasam Furs that its liability under the two receipts attached to, and made part of, the complaint and comprising the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Checkley v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Healy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Thompson v. Mobile Light & R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chazen v. Trailmobile, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Magee v. Walbro, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Omni Aviation Managers, Inc. v. BuckleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Omni Aviation Managers, Inc. v. BuckleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API